As I write this blog, over 12,000 inmates in the
California prison system are on a hunger strike. They strike for more humane
treatment and decent living conditions, better food, eased overcrowding,
improved medical care.
Two
years ago, the United States Supreme Court ruled that California’s prison
system violated the constitution’s prohibition against cruel and unusual
punishment. At the time, California’s prisons were at 157% of capacity. On
average, two inmates were dying each week. It was a corrections system devoid
of correction making a mockery of the state’s justice system.
The
court ordered California to reduce the prison population by approximately
30,000 inmates within eighteen months. Since then, California has thumbed their
noses at the court, transferring thousands of state inmates to local jail
control rather than releasing them. California DOC has crippled local law
enforcement who are now burdened with caring for too many incarcerated state
inmates.
The
state of California daily violates the constitutional rights of its
incarcerated. What, I ask, does that say about our respect for the “rule of
law?” And, what does it say about the men behind bars who continue to press
their case for lawful incarceration conditions?
Dr.
Martin Luther King, Jr. said you should judge a man when things are at their
worst. Dr. King would be proud of the hunger strikers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
At
Guantanamo Bay, a number of Muslim prisoners, also on a hunger strike, are
being force fed on instruction of the Obama Justice Department. More
disturbing, these force feedings are occurring during the Ramadan fast period.
A
Federal Judge has skewered the force feeding policy. It is important to
remember none of the men currently being held at Guantanamo have been convicted
of any crime. The United States Government has lost two major Supreme Court
actions involving detention of “enemy combatants.”
Benjamin
Franklin reminded his founding father brethren that “surrendering your liberty
in the name of security leaves you with neither.” I wonder what old Ben would
say about the power of the federal government to hold a foreign national for
more than ten years without charge and trial?
No comments:
Post a Comment