COMMENTS POLICY

Bars-N-Stripes is not responsible for any comments made by contributors in the Comments pages. However Bars-N-Stripes will exercise its right to moderate and edit comments which are deemed to be offensive or unsuited to the subject matter of this site.

Comments deemed to be spam or questionable spam will be deleted. Including a link to relevant content is permitted, but comments should be relevant to the post topic.
Comments including profanity will be deleted.
Comments containing language or concepts that could be deemed offensive will be deleted.
The owner of this blog reserves the right to edit or delete any comments submitted to this blog without notice. This comment policy is subject to change at any time.

Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Grover Norquist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Grover Norquist. Show all posts

Sunday, November 10, 2013

You Can't Spell it without D-O-C

You can’t spell “department outsourcing” without DOC. We learned that again this week when memos were posted from the central office advising that on October 1, 2013 facilities will no longer accept money orders for deposits to inmate accounts. All funds sent in after that date will have to be mailed to either “JPay” at a Florida lockbox address or submitted electronically to JPay.
            
Who is JPay? It’s a stock company that’s part of the prison-industrial complex. Companies like JPay perform significant parts of DOC’s prison operation. They receive millions in fees from the states and the families of the incarcerated to handle many of the day to day functions inside prison. States will tell you its more cost effective. That would be a lie.
           
Like much that is wrong with the current state of government, so is DOC’s reliance on private contractors to handle prison-related work. The state prosecutes a person and then sentences a person to time in prison. The state is solely and wholly responsible for the inmate’s care and upkeep. Remember, it takes extraordinary effort to deprive a person of their God-given rights to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.”
           
But, in their rush to be tough on crime, politicians lie to the public about the true cost of depriving a man or woman of their freedom. In Virginia, it costs an average of almost $30,000 per year, per inmate. And the process is labor intensive. Add to that the condition of many of the inmates. A significant portion of the inmate population suffers from psychological disease or disorders. Take my bunkmate “Thomas.” “Thomas” suffers from schizophrenia. Every two weeks he gets an injection of Halcion, a very strong anti-psychotic drug to keep the “voices” still. By day twelve (of his fourteen day shot cycle) he begins to hear the voices again. Shot day and he is in full blown psychosis. The shot brings him back.
            
Mornings and evenings Thomas takes pills to assist him with his mental disease. Miss a day and he’s a mess. Thomas isn’t an aberration in here. He is one of perhaps two hundred men who daily take psychotropic meds.
            
Should prison be used to house the mentally ill? That’s another day’s blog. But, DOC has outsourced medical care inside prison. And, the medical care is abysmal. Medications routinely run out. The on-site physician serves as a “gate keeper.” He and he alone, decides who gets to see a specialist. That explains why young men with burst appendixes are returned to the building (only to be rushed later to the hospital); why cardiac distress is misdiagnosed until a massive heart attack occurs; and why cancer is not diagnosed until stage three or four.
            
Companies bid on the medical care. The goal is to see as many patients as possible, as quickly as possible, without sending them to a specialist. Under that arrangement quality medical care is sacrificed. Worse, the state still pays. Medical costs for inmates have grown dramatically since DOC began outsourcing care.
           
Back to the JPay money order issue. Here’s the socio-economic “reality” of prison life: most inmates come from lower socio-economic classes. America is a very class conscious society, contrary to what the politicians tell you. Poor people get poor legal advice; poor legal advice lands you in prison.
            
One of the main determiners of success post release is a support network of family and friends. Many of the incarcerated from poor families receive money: a twenty dollar money order here or there to buy hygiene products and stamps, or food. That little bit of money helps them survive in here. They lack the education – or skills – to earn forty-five cents an hour (top wage inside). They work part-time cleaning jobs at twenty-seven cents an hour, or ten dollars a month. Try buying deodorant, toothpaste, soap, and a razor on ten dollars. Try buying laundry detergent so your clothes don’t stink.
            
JPay charges three dollars on the first $50.00 sent in. There’s another three dollars on each fifty thereafter. For a family with limited financial means, those surcharges for the “privilege” of maintaining connection with your family behind bars, is a hardship. Unfortunately, it’s like that a lot in here. Phone rates are outrageous with huge kickbacks (aka commissions) being paid back to the states.
           
Companies in the prison-industrial complex make huge profits. They use those profits to contribute to political candidate campaigns who then vote in more sweetheart contracts. Meanwhile, the poor bleed more dollars; the taxpayers see more money wasted, money that could be used for better schools and better futures for the children of this state and nation.
            
Diverse groups, from the National Council of Churches and the ACLU to the “Right on Crime” organization and Grover Norquist’s tax reform group have united in their desire to see prison reform become a reality. For too many politicians, however, it’s easier to sign contracts with private contractors to carry out the basic responsibilities the state bears when it convicts and incarcerates a person.
            
Outsourcing prison functions is economic voodoo. It is also morally corrupt. It hides the true cost of sending a man or woman to prison. It increases the likelihood that a released felon will re-offend. Virginia DOC’s outsourced JPay plan is just another in a series of underhanded attempts by the department to sustain that which is unsustainable: $1.2 billion each year.
            
The actual cost of each outsourced contract should be publicly disclosed by DOC. And, no contract should be permitted that results in increased fees for the family and friends of those behind bars trying to stay in touch with inmates. Finally, companies under contract with state government agencies should be prohibited from providing “gifts” to politicians. Somehow I think if all that was implemented you’d see less outsourced contracts and less men and women behind bars.


Wednesday, December 14, 2011

New “old way” to do things

Ms. S, a petite 40-something black woman, walked in our building Wednesday and announced “I am your unit manager.  Everything that happens in the building goes through me.”  Unit manager?  The old heads just laughed.  “We had unit managers in the 70’s and the 90’s”, they said.
Why is it that Virginia keeps recycling the same tired, unsuccessful ideas from the past?  They didn’t work then, they won’t work now.
As I’ve written before, Governor McDonnell and DOC Director Clarke must get creative and daring in dealing with prisons.

Two good places to start are with the recommendations expressed by “Right on Crime” a conservative think tank with support from the likes of Newt Gingrich, Ed Meese and Grover Norquist.  Longer sentences don’t work.  Reinstituting tired ideas like “unit managers” in prison buildings won’t work.  Real prison reform is needed. 
Then there is research by Professor Philip Cook of Duke and Jens Ludwig of Chicago whose research on controlling crime through reducing prison sentences is both cost effective and innovative.

It’s time for Virginia to get some new ideas in corrections.

Saturday, September 3, 2011

The Cost of Doing Nothing

I watched with mixed emotions as the country went through the seizures of defaulting on the national debt.  Part of me was deeply amused.  Every cable news outlet had their “breaking news” and a countdown clock to debt Armageddon.  Both parties – and the president as well – played simple, false sound bites.  The “Tea Party” pushed demagoguery to a new limit.  Ah America, “God shed His grace on thee.”  And Virginia’s Governor?  He did more creative bookkeeping than I did to land myself in prison.
Governor McDonnell touted a $500 million surplus, except, he forgot to tell people he failed to meet the payment requirements to the Virginia Retirement System.  There is no surplus.  VRS is almost $17 billion underfunded and the Commonwealth still has an IOU outstanding to VRS for the prior year’s budget debacle.  And McDonnell has the brass set to go on CNN as a “possible VP” nominee and tout Virginia’s economic well-being.
A pox on both their houses!  As “The Economist” noted in an OpEd piece on March 19, 2011: 

“…despite all the rhetoric from the tea partiers, big government is not just the fault of the self-interested bureaucrats and leftist politicians.  Conservative voters…have kept on demanding the state do more…the right has built prisons, announced wars on drugs and terror, and indulged generals, farmers, and policemen…”
What we have seen in the recent economic unraveling is that everything costs.  And the bill for America’s love affair with “tough on crime” mass incarceration policy has come due.  Governor McDonnell can lead or he can step aside.  But, the time for change is now.

As states such as Texas, Oklahoma, Kansas and Kentucky have realized, there are more effective and less expensive ways to handle most non-violent offenders.  These states are employing alternatives to sending someone convicted of a crime to prison.  They utilize home incarceration and day center reporting versus prison.
This isn’t a “bleeding heart liberal” approach.  Conservatives such as former Reagan Attorney General Ed Meese, drug czar William Bennett, Newt Gingrich and anti-tax advocate Grover Norquist are pushing for prison reform.

Where is Virginia in this discussion?  Not even involved.  Virginia will spend $25,000 to keep me housed in a low level facility this year and the costs continue to climb.  I am unable to pay restitution for my embezzlement while in here; I do not pay taxes; I do not help raise my youngest son.  Three years I’ve spent behind bars.  If Bob McDonnell was really the politician he claims to be, he’d look at my situation and the thousands like it.  He’d let us “do our time” outside the walls; working, making restitution, being productive citizens.
As the "Sentencing Project" reported recently, lawmakers in Kansas, Michigan, New Jersey and New York adopted significant policy changes to reduce prison populations.

“In each of these state a range of policy changes were adopted, including sentencing reforms, alternatives for ‘prison-bound’ people, reducing time served in prison, addressing parole release rates and reducing revocations”
23 states have made significant changes in the way sentences are handed out and the length of time an inmate serves – Virginia is not one of those 23.

Bob McDonnell and the Virginia General Assembly can make a difference.  $1 billion a year to house 40,000 inmates is enough reason to try.  They need to enact a real “earned good time credit” system that aggressively rewards inmates who seek to change and improve.  Early release should not just be a goal, but the mission of corrections.
Virginia can no longer afford to do nothing.  Virginia needs real solutions, not “creative” accounting.  The economic realities that showed their true colors this summer prove that government must make smart choices.  No longer can the U.S. with 5 percent of the world’s population, keep 25 percent of the world’s inmates behind bars.

Perhaps Governor McDonnell will finally get it.

Thursday, May 5, 2011

Strange Bedfellows

I was sent a copy of the recently released NAACP report calling for a change in current incarceration policies. The report appropriately titled “Misplaced Priorities: Over Incarcerate, Under Educate” (http://naacp.3cdn.net/01d6f368edbe135234_bq0m68x5h.pdf)  is a scathing indictment of America’s love affair with prisons. What was truly ironic is who is standing with the NAACP and their clarion call for reform. Grover Norquist, President of Americans for Tax Reform – a conservative advocacy group – stood directly behind NAACP President Benjamin Todd Jealous as he presented the report. Republican Presidential hopeful and former Speaker of the House, Newt Gingrich sent a letter of support. What would bring such diverse parties together? Sadly, it is the growing realization that this nation’s prison system is failing. They say politics makes strange bedfellows. Perhaps justice requires even stranger ones.



The NAACP report is eye opening for its simple, direct message. They call the current system the “prison industrial complex”. That is quite an apt name for a system nationwide that costs almost $70 billion per year to maintain. As I’ve pointed out before, the lucrative sweetheart contracts given by state DOC’s to conglomerates like Keefe and Global Tel Link line private pockets at the expense of taxpayers, inmates and their families alike.


As the recent Pew Center Study (http://www.pewcenteronthestates.org/uploadedFiles/Pew_State_of_Recidivism.pdf)  showed, increased spending and incarceration rates have done nothing to reduce recidivism. In fact, the opposite has happened. Shortly after the Pew Study was released, Virginia began touting the fact that “sixteen years after banning parole, Virginia has defied the nation’s unshakably high recidivism level…”


The story reported that Virginia’s 2007 recidivism rate (for inmates released three years earlier) was 28.3 percent versus a national rate of 43.3 percent. Buried just below that “amazing statistic”, attributable to Virginia’s unjust denial of early release to model inmates, was this fact, “the rate has edged up slightly since 2000”. In other words, the rate was lower just after parole was abolished. Sounds to me like the trend is going the wrong way.


As the Washington Post noted in an editorial on April 18, the “NAACP report…is the most recent to argue convincingly that public safety can be preserved and tax dollars saved with smarter policies…Individuals must be held accountable for breaking the law, and in many cases, especially those involving violent offenses, imprisonment is the best way to protect public safety…But the levels of incarceration are financially unsustainable and in many instances counterproductive…”


The “radical proposals” the NAACP came up with that are supported by all these conservatives include shortening prison terms (recommendation # 8) and increasing parole release rates (recommendation # 9). Ironically, at the recently completed session of the General Assembly, Delegate Donald McEachin’s proposed bill to give Virginia inmates enrolled in vocational or educational programs (and the classroom aides) ten days of earned good time credit (versus the current 4 ½) never made it out of committee.


Sadly, it appears that the NAACP report, along with all the other evidence being compiled to show that prison reform is needed is falling on deaf ears here in Virginia.


In a Washington Post letter to the editor (http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/window-dressing-in-virginia/2011/04/15/AFFX03vD_story.html) on April 15th, Vienna resident John Horejsi, a member of Governor McDonnell’s “Prisoner and Juvenile Re-entry Council” noted that of the numerous recommendations made by this group on issues addressing recidivism, parole, taxpayer costs, “only one…unfortunately, was presented to go forward.” He then said the following:


“There is widespread agreement that we, a group of citizens asked by the governor to serve, were perhaps no more than window dressing.”


Is Governor McDonnell just another politician using “tough on crime” sound bites to buy votes or is he courageous? The answer will be seen if he becomes a strange bedfellow of the NAACP report.