A week ago our assistant warden announced a change in meal
schedules. For ten years “common fare”
participants (i.e. religious diets) have eaten first. As I’ve documented over the life of this blog,
the battle over religious rights – including religious meals – has been fought
for years behind the walls. Numerous
Federal court opinions have held that an inmate in prison retains his/her right
to practice their faith and if that faith requires certain dietary rules
to be observed (i.e. Kosher for Jewish inmates) then those diets must be
reasonably accommodated.
Virginia DOC for years fought giving special diet
trays. By fits and starts, DOC relented in
the face of dozens of First Amendment suits (how ironic, all the “law and order”
types seek to fight application of Constitutional rights to prisoners where the
Constitution is the “ultimate” law of the land) and “common fare” was
instituted. Rather than looking at each inmate’s
religious practice on a case by case basis (Federal Courts have approved an
objective test: does the inmate present
a faith based petition for special diet?), Virginia set up a one size fits all
approach. Attend any approved
church/religious service twice a month for six months, then you are eligible
for common fare.
Hundreds of guys signed up after joining Messianic Jewish
services, Jehovah Witnesses, Rastafarians, Nation of Islam, or traditional
Christian or Muslim services. And that’s
where the rub hits. It costs DOC
approximately $1.75 per day to feed the average inmate. It costs over three time that much to feed
common fare. In an age where state
budgets are stretched and still Virginia politicians won’t admit the obvious
truth – there are too many people incarcerated for too long – common fare trays
cost too much to provide.
Enter the Assistant Warden.
He announces common fare participants will eat last at breakfast and
dinner and go at 11:00 am for lunch (before count). His rationale, told to officers and teachers “I
just want to shake things up and see what comes out”. He wants guys to quit common fare and the
effects his “shake up” have on programs are irrelevant if he gets his desired
result.
What effects? Glad
you asked. Factory workers cannot go to
the shop to make chairs that are sold at above value prices to state agencies
to help pay for DOC (the costs of which are borne by the taxpayers) until after
chow call. That’s an hour and a half later than usual, a tremendous loss of productivity
(not to mention pay for the guys).
Then there’s school.
Because of the early lunch call, common fare participants in 2nd
period (and aides) leave thirty minutes early.
That’s 2 ½ hours lost each week out of 7 ½ hours of school time per
student. How odd, I thought. Education is the number one way to break the
cycle of recidivism and this administration has taken 1/3 of an inmate’s weekly
school time and flushed it.
The same happens at 5th period school (4:30 to
7:30). Common fare participants cannot
go to school until after chow (5:30). 5th
period classes meet twice a week, so two out of six hours are lost.
Did the Assistant Warden think this out? I like to think he’s just foolish. However, my experience in here has taught me
guys like the Assistant Warden are dangerous.
Power goes to their heads. They
see the prison as their private fiefdom or lab and they make rash decisions
without consulting the people on the front lines, like the teachers. The fact that their decisions run contrary to
the Governor’s re-entry speak apparently doesn’t matter.
Then there’s prison mail.
DOC has a host of rules governing inmate mail. Letters must weigh less than one ounce; there
can be no “contraband” (an ambiguous word, contraband is defined as anything
not approved for an inmate). An
especially touchy subject involves photos.
“No nude, semi-nude, lingerie photos allowed.” So your 80 year old grandparents send you a
picture taken of them walking on the beach in bathing suits? Disallowed.
Yet, inmates can order 5 X 7 photo cards of totally nude women from “pen
pal” catalogs.
I don’t disagree with all of DOC’s mail rules. They’re an inconvenience but heck, we’re in
prison. The problem is the individual
decision making is left to the discretion of each prison’s operations
officer. And that is the rub.
The other day Craig was denied a letter (when mail is
rejected we receive a form letter notifying us of the “ground” for rejection)
based on “lingerie photos”. Craig’s
girlfriend was going to a concert and had a friend snap a photo of her in
jeans, cowboy boots, and a red silk top.
Not only was the photo rejected, but a large “X” was written through it
and the letter and photo then torn and returned to her. On the outside of the envelope a DOC ink stamp
noted “letter returned…nude photos”.
Craig’s girlfriend was furious. She called here and spoke to the operations
officer who told her the photo was disallowed because “silk blouses are
lingerie”. Want to hear something funny? The operations officer – a mid-forties
African American woman – wears silk blouses almost every day. The issue hasn’t been dropped. Craig’s girlfriend contacted an attorney and
called the Director’s office.
The problem is each prison interprets this rule. Subjective decision-making is never good,
especially when the subjective basis set out is illogical. As the same time this battle was playing out
the Washington Post was reporting on DOC’s “televisit” set-up in Alexandria
allowing Northern Virginia families to visit, via video connection, with their family
members in the far Southwest (eight to ten hours from Alexandria). “A sense of family is critical to an inmate’s
successful reintegration into society” a researcher was quoted as saying.
So, why does DOC allow its prison to interfere with
communications from family and friends in such arbitrary ways? Why, if we know that connection to the real
world leads to successful reintegration, does DOC tolerate such behavior in
their prison administrators?
Again, I fear the answer isn’t ignorance, it’s darker. Fewer inmates require fewer prisons. Fewer prisons mean fewer guards, fewer
operations directors, fewer wardens.
Prison operations are a $70 billion industry and all that money is from public
funds. I’m not a conspiracy proponent,
but when National Review writers such as Jonah Goldberg, in a recent column
about California’s corrupt and dysfunctional (and unconstitutional) prison
system say the following: “in a state
where more than two-thirds of crime is attributable to recidivism [CA DOC’s
officers union) has spent millions of dollars lobbying against rehabilitation
programs, favoring instead policies that will grow the inmate population and
the ranks of prison guards…” Kind of
makes me think my conspiracy thoughts aren’t too farfetched.
“There but for the
grace of God go I.” I opened this blog
using that expression. Funny thing about
grace. It usually shows up in the most
difficult of circumstances. As I sit
here and watch the immovable object – “tough on crime” – come face to face with
the economic realities of 9% unemployment, European market melt downs, a
political season filled with hollow promises, I realize God has me exactly
where I need to be. Things are becoming
clear to me about this states, this nations, failed criminal justice
system. God’s grace, you see, even finds
its way into the prisons.
No comments:
Post a Comment